HRA RELEASE: Australia in danger - an obstinate power hungry egomaniac: Prime Minister Julia Gillard exposed as a racist.

Gerry first up do you think the office of Prime Minister of Australia deserves a little bit more respect than to address our Prime Minister as Julia? manners cost nothing what is your excuse?

You call the Prime Minister racist because the Prime Minister is trying to stop the dangerous practice of coming to Australia in leaking boats endangering human life provided by criminals with nothing more than a quick easy buck to be made by them, they have no compassion for fellow human beings it's all about easy money, this point alone is why this practice should be stopped,This is why our Prime Minister claims that Nauru is not a deterrent -the Prime Minister says the Howard government processed asylum seekers on Nauru and about 95 per cent of those people were resettled in Australia.If 95% are resettled in Australia these criminals will keep putting peoples lives at risk by putting them on unsea-worthy boats.While these que jumpers are resettled in Australia they are stopping the asylum seekers who have gone through the right channels and are waiting for their chance to enter Australia in camps overseas and now have to wait for years longer in some cases,is this fair to them I think not.Gerry there is no way our Prime Minister is racist no matter how you twist the truth. Prime Minister Gillard is just trying to be fair to all asylum seekers and to stamp out another boat sinking and people dying. And good on the Prime Minister for that.You are trying to make out our Prime Minister does not want to take Asylum seekers and you are wrong because the Prime Minister does.The Malaysian solution will stop the boats and save lives,If it was up to you Gerry you would let all the boats in and more people would die on these boats because more would come and take their chance on these death ships and it's just chance that they make it, thats not too smart is it Gerry!

Gerry you call our Prime Minister a "egomaniac" or use such words as maniacal obstinacy but I would call it Strong and Tuff and this is what I look for when I vote for a person to become Prime Minister of Australia but thats just me. If you want a weak push over for a Prime Minister then go ahead vote for Bob Brown thats what democracy is all about and may the better man or woman win.

So to call our Prime Minister Racist for trying to stop the death boats is as silly as calling you sexist because you don't agree with the Prime Minister because she is a Woman.I would have thought for someone that convenes a meeting you would have been smarter than that Gerry!

Hmmm sounds like dan is a labor staffer i i

Hi Dan, this is Gerry - I understand your points and respect them in relation to what you describe as the Office of the Prime Minister. In terms of the ABCC I am with you all the way and in the imputation of the encumbrances and manifest in peoples lives the ABCC not only imputes however coerces as the lived reality. With Carbon well we probably won't agree and I don't agree with the measures of any of the mainstream political parties, because in less than a few centuries even the great carbon stores such as the world's forests, which are diminishing from the 38% of total landmass they are at, will not be able to store any more carbon, they have their limits, and the world's oceans are being affected by the increased store of carbon. I agree with your imputation that not all climactic change is the result of humans however it has been significantly contributed to as a result of various pollution, daily dumps into various spheres and the pressures by carbon - and you only have to distinguish from the differences, and quality of life, of rural living verse the metropolises. I do not agree with taxes, this will make next to zero difference however we need to eliminate certain types of production and their 'run-offs'. "Money" and the concept of 'economy' is used to entrap arguments, initiatives and peoples - wage slavery is a phenomenal tool, and often inadvertent - and the ABCC is part of this type of entrapment.

In terms of my references to Julia, well we have crossed paths on occasion, and we've met, and I understand all the protocols delivered to office and I respect your position and your views and your courtesies, however I have mine, we may agree on some and differ on others - I don't hold much stock in titles and all that and I don't much use them for me - PM Gillard is only a year older than me and well she just happens to be the Prime Minister and yes she has invested much of her 'adult life' in achieving this. When I spoke to her recently, July 20 (2011), and previously on June 9 (2010)I did speak to her as 'Julia' and not the 'Prime Minister' as from my view a title dissociates peoples and is makebelieve airs - I talk straight to a person and not through corridors of titles. In terms of her being PM well I recognise this obviously and in terms of the powers she wields and the capacity she has to affect society and human lives and worth.

In terms of this government as a racist government undoubtedly I unequivocally believe this and believe it to my witness - and even when I spoke to her on July 20 that is the clear impresssion I left that day with - I have spoken to so many folk who are parliamentarians who don't realise, and many do!, their racist underwriting and layers - and racism has many layers, many of these layers yet unveiled. Yes Dan, I believe Julia Gillard to be who she puts herself out to be, someone that has made up a 'people smugglers business model', similarly as arguments have been made up about the ABCC, and yes I agree with you that Julia Gillard is standing firm in what she believes in, and it is an insult to infer she isn't, so we agree there, in that she believes that the Malaysian option is a way to immolate the initiative of people to come to Australia who are desperately seeking Asylum. I believe she doesn't want them here, and we have this ridiculour 14,000 thereabouts low resettlement quota, speaks for itself.

I disagree with your imputations about 'drownings' at sea as it underscores the contextual. The government doesn't care about saving lives, or stopping these folk from drowning - the SIEV X proves that when 353 drowned, 146 children and 142 women among them. However, drownings are contextually very few, and in terms of people deported to where they came from, from so called rejections, well more have died or been persecuted from where they came than since the drownings of the SIEV X which the Australian government at the time contributed in bringing on with Operation Relex. More people drown in Australian swimming pools and rivers, and in terms of percentage/proportion to population measures, than who drown risking all for Asylum to our shores. Our Asylum Seekers realise that there is less than 2% chance of drowning at sea as compared to say 40 or 50% of being killed in their homeland.

Gerry.

I agree with Gerry on all counts. The man should be a social and political commentator on TV and radio. He could do a lot of good but the Gerrys of the world don't get included in probably because he is too cluey and coherent and can change peoples views! I agree with the HRA, Sydney RAC and NSW Labor for Refugees media releases. Unfortunately for them Power rests with the few, not the many.

Egomaniacs everywhere maties although most of them or the worst of them are in parliament.

I've come to like you Gerry but mate you'll never change anything, people are shits, they don't care like you do. Don't bang your head, it won't change anything.