By 9AM on Saturday February 5th, areas of Melbourne Metropolitan area had received their highest rainfall total on record. Although the rain event has been extensively reported, the historically significant level of these rains has been almost completely unremarked upon in the mainstream press. For example Berwick in Melbourne’s South East received, 168mm and Officer receiving an incredible 195mm
The only comparable events in the last hundred years were in December 1934, February 1973 and Feb 2005. An examination of table from the Bureau of Meteorology shows that the rainfall total for Officer was the highest on record for any Melbourne suburb since records began. This oversight fits the pattern of the mainstream media attempting to normalise extreme climate events to prevent the public from clamouring for action on climate change.
Neither the The Age, Herald Sun or the ABC Online made any mention of how historically significant this rain event was.
The following paragraph from a Melbourne Water press release explains just how intense the rains were around Melbourne:
In the 24 hours from 9am on 4 February to 9am on 5 February 2011, metro Melbourne experienced intense storms. Rainfall was highest in the eastern and south-eastern suburbs, with some isolated parts of the system seeing rainfall intensity consistent with a 1-in-500 year storm. Other parts were lower than this (around 1-in-20 years) but the February rainfall averages for virtually all areas were exceeded with a few hours.
The last two years in Melbourne have seen the highest ever recorded temperature on Black Saturday February 2009 of 46 degrees, a massive hailstorm on 6th March 2010 and now the highest ever recorded rainfall event within metropolitan Melbourne. 2011 in Australia has already seen two cyclones in Queensland, deadly flooding in four states and a record heatwave in Sydney
A report has also recently been released stating that by 2030 Melbourne will flood more often due to a combination of aging infrastructure and more intense rain events because of climate change.
The Age article from Sunday 6th February, Victoria swamped:storm wreaks havoc is a case in point. Whilst extensively listing the damage to Melbourne, it again does not mention either that the rainfalls in Melbourne's south east were the largest on record for a Melbourne suburb. Nor does it link the storm to climate change. Even though it includes the following paragraph:
"Bureau of Meteorology forecaster Terry Ryan said the ''unprecedented'' movement of cyclone Yasi inland to the Northern Territory, combined with a longer cloud band caused by ex-cyclone Anthony, had produced a humid and unstable air mass over Victoria. ''We've never seen anything like it in Australia,'' he said."
The 2007 IPCC clearly stated that "Based on a range of models, it is likely that future tropical cyclones (typhoons and hurricanes) will become more intense, with larger peak wind speeds and more heavy precipitation associated with ongoing increases of tropical sea surface temperatures."referenced here. The Age like many other media outlets is failing to put the recent swathe of extreme weather events in their correct context.
Whilst El Nina and El Nino have obviously played a part in recent weather events it is also clear that as predicted by the IPCC for decades, these natural cycles are being accentuated by human induced climate change. The media rather than normalising the increasing levels of extreme weather events should instead be raising the alarm that urgent action is required to slash Australia’s and the worlds carbon emissions. The cost of “business as usual” is becoming more obvious by the day.
Image of submerged car in Belgrave in Melbourne's East on Saturday 5th Feb 2011

Comments
Climategate showed what those conspirators are really up to!!!
The cat is out of the bag.
If you want real some real evidence check out these great vids
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7nnVQ2fROOg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uXesBhYwdRo
Re: Media covers up metropolitan Melbourne’s biggest rain ...
Flowerpower what you got to say now ? we got proof man made climate change is a rubbish the books were cooked have some guts and say sorry for being a fool
Re: Media covers up metropolitan Melbourne’s biggest rain ...
Where is this proof? Can you please post some links to it?
Re: Media covers up metropolitan Melbourne’s biggest rain ...
Nothing to say? No links? No evidence?
In case you didn't click on the links in a comment just up a bit, they actually are a good analysis of the 'climategate' affair.
Here is another video from potholer54 showing how climate sceptics misrepresent the science.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PTY3FnsFZ7Q
Re: Media covers up metropolitan Melbourne’s biggest rain ...
Look up Climategate scandal and 2009 paper confirming IPCC sea level conclusion withdrawn.If you need more proof let me know.
Re: Media covers up metropolitan Melbourne’s biggest rain ...
Climategate? That's your evidence that climate change isn't real? That's laughable. The whole thing was a media beat up.
Re: Media covers up metropolitan Melbourne’s biggest rain ...
Cant handle the truth.
The only thing that is a media beat up is global warming
Re: Media covers up metropolitan Melbourne’s biggest rain ...
what about the 2009 IPCC paper that was with drawn from the scientific journal confirming sea level rise due to too many mistakes?.
And climategate why was all the Research data hidden from the public ? Why was data left out ?
Climate change is a hypothesis as all climate scientist state which means it's not necessarily true is that your proof now your laughable if you are going to treat a theory as Gospel truth.
Re: Media covers up metropolitan Melbourne’s biggest rain ...
Today is the coldest February day for six years and the wettest summer since 1910/11 Global warming ? climate change?if so what made it so wet in the summer of 1910/11 was it planes and jets no they were invented in 1903 and jets in 1933 was it cars they were invented 1886 not too many in Australia at that time.
Or is it a normal cycle that has been happening for millions of years ? we don't have records that go back that far.
Can any one help ???????
Media covers up metropolitan Melbourne’s biggest rain ...
why are people so completely 'amazed' at the media reporting natural catastrophes? Why are people just carrying on with their 9 to 9 jobs? Wake up people and stop contributing to this mess. Stop working. Stop all of your activities and start fighting for land rights and for a system based on justice and not charity. Wake up and start to change this oppressive system that is obsolete. Start learning about the law of the land...what you are seeing on the tele..once we lived like that as black and as white people and we did not 'pay' to live off of the land. That is a man (not woman) made concept. Stop taking orders from some fictitious system and start breathing again. Stop working for the ethically challenged white man and start empowering yourself.
Stop the ration based system. The ethically oppressed capitalist scions have pulled us off our lands (Indigenous and whites) to hand us all rations and force us into 'voluntary' work and not paying us for it. That is how far gone the system is. If we keep going the mental health issues will be out of control as will people's level of violence. An oppressive system breeds violence, hatred and anger, all very destructive emotions. We fail to realise that we can change this through meaningful dialogue and positive action towards the enrichment of our lives and preserving everything green, old growth rain forests, the waters, the air. I don't want a leader but the masses want a leader. So choose a leader that does not work with corporations and the concrete and bitumen people of the world. Choose Indigenous leaders to run the country. Come on it is too late in the day and it is getting even later..Stop the spread of cancer.
Re: Media covers up metropolitan Melbourne’s biggest rain ...
choose an Indigenous leader who is not a capitalist. Steal a copy of Noel Pearson's book. He is a black man with a corrupted mind with ideas of capitalism and apartheid which cause a lot of suffering for people.
The land is for all of us not just for the corporations.
Re: Media covers up metropolitan Melbourne’s biggest rain ...
Look, I agree with the concern about media cover up with the historical significance of the amount of rainfall Melbourne received. What really concerns me, however, is this trend to call rain a 'rain event'. Or a storm a 'storm event' Or a flood or flooding a 'flood event'. What's with the 'event'? I guess we'll have to start calling Black Saturday a nasty 'fire event'?
Ditch the redundant 'event' folks. It adds no value to the preceeding word and is indicative of the creep of weasle words into our daily language.
The "date slug" is a courtesy to readers and helps research
First a small point on journalistic standards (which are notoriously lacking in many blogs, however interesting they may be). A dateline should precede all posts and any initial mention of the date in the body of the article should carry the full date, including the year. Reading this blog posting I was frustrated by the lack of a "year date" until well down in the article. Just a small but important point. The initial "slug" might well also contain the point of origin of the report, e.g.: "Melbourne, 23 January 2013". Cached web pages can linger for ever, so even a worthy blog posting can become irrelevant because the date context is unknown if there happens to be no mention of the date of issue in the body of the blog. The "date slug" is a courtesy to readers and increases the efficiency of research. My "real" response will follow (unless excised by the blogger).
Nobody has estimated thermal contributions to temperature
Odd weather patterns? Well, well! Nobody on the planet, as far as I know, has ever, ever, ever even attempted to produce an inventory of the number of fumeroles in the deep ocean trenches that form mighty cracks in the earth's crust. Readers may not be aware that there is one monstrously large trench that starts off the Greenland coast, splits the Atlantic in two, from north to south, snakes around South Africa across the Southern Ocean, crosses underneath Australia, then shoots off at an angle across the Pacific until it reaches the North American coast. Huge! Monstrous in size and depth! Almost totally unexplored! Many of these (number unknown) emit vast quantities of carbon dioxide (and other gases). Likewise, nobody, absolutely nobody, has produced even an estimate of the thermal contributions to our planet's temperature from the thermal emissions from these same deep ocean tranches - or from the terrestrial and atmospheric heating effects of deep geo-thermal cycles. It is notable that the polar regions have been totally devoid of ice for more time, in the context of gelologocal eras, than they have been covered with ice. The ebb and flow of ice over the planet in the ice-ages is on a gargantuan scale, driven by global cycles that our infant science, barely a few hundred years old in the modern sense has not measured, let alone understood. We have no real understanding of the causes of these fluctuations although it is totally likely that the causal factors are closely associated with natural variations in the emissions of carbon dioxide. Unmeasured, and dare one say "unmeasurable" heating and "carbon" effects of vulcanism, plate tectonics, and cyclic "earth core" events, including (perhaps) variations in the earth's magnetic field, may well (for all we know) be a dominant factor in the present suspected trend in the rise in global temperatures and atmospheric carbon. Likewise, sea-levels are also prone to massive natural variations.
This is not to say that we humans should continue to emit carbon dioxide and other gases at an ever increasing rate, or even allow our populations to continue increasing, but perhaps considered action at a measured pace will, in the long term, be more effective than knee-jerk reactions that damage economies.
It seems to me that better understanding of the earth's cycles should be our prioity and that policies should be directed to coping strategies for human populations, rather than hysterical reactions to carbon increases that may well be natural - and almost unavoidable.