2,200 protest at plutonium shipments from UK to Germany

About 2,200 nuclear opponents demonstrated outside the Grohnde power station in central north Germany on Sunday 16 January. The protesters, from very young to quite elderly, squatted outside the nuke in a symbolic action. They demanded that the federal and state governments scrap nuclear transport plans.

MOX (mixed oxide) fuel from the Sellafied processing plant in Cumbria, northern England, is to be transported to Grohnde. Close to the village of Seascale on the coast of the Irish Sea, Sellafield, was formerly known as Windscale.

The consignment is to include 400 kilograms of plutonium. Already one millionth of a gram of plutonium can cause cancer, opponents say.

Among the demonstrators were 50 farmers with tractors from the region and from the Gorleben area, the site of a nuclear dump.

For the first quarter of this year, the power company E-on has requested permission from the radiation safety authority to bring in 16 plutonium-containing MOX fuel elements. E-on owns 83% of the nuke, commissioned in 1984, the city of Bielefeld the other 17%.

300px-DE_KKW_Grohnde.jpgOpponents wrote that in case of an accident with a nuclear consignment followed by a longer fire, or a big collision, plutonium particles could get into the air.

By using MOX, Grohnde will become even more dangerous than other nukes.
The protest was supported by 10 civic action groups across the region, which includes a number of big-population cities. Hanover is 60 km away, Hildesheim 50, Salzgitter 90, Braunschweig 140, Bielefeld 90.

Grohnde.jpgThe Grohnde nuke has one reactor that uses 193 fuel assemblies and utilises both enriched uranium and MOX fuel. In 1985, 1986, 1987, 1989, 1990 and 1998 the reactor produced more net electricity for the respective year than any other reactor in the world. The plant is of the pressurised water reactor type, using four water based coolant cycles, kept under high pressure.

Comments

A very informative article. And a necessary one. One struggles to find such information from the mainstream media. Especially from the Australian media. So - it's not about Australia?
Well, we Australians are pretty busy, navel-gazing as we cover issues Australian, and especially if they're about our own football, cricket, or tennis players.
But this article has relevance for Australians.
On the one hand,it well and truly contradicts the hype that the nuclear industry is popular and thriving, world-wide.
On the other hand, is it not a warning note to Australians. We could find ourselves in the same position. As a member of the International Framework for Nuclear Energy Cooperation (IFNEC) Australia is obligated to take back radioactive wastes from its uranium exports.

There is something unsettling about the transportation of 400 kilograms of Plutonium from Sellafield on the Irish Sea to a site in North Central Germany. This transportation route cannot avoid populated areas, and it does not seem capable of being rendered safe from accidents or attacks.