“Winner of caucus spill must talk about Aboriginal sovereignty”

MEDIA RELEASE

By Michael Anderson, spokesperson for the National Unity Aboriginal government

Goodooga, northwest NSW, 26 February 2012 - - An Aboriginal activist says “given the absolute dysfunction of the Labor party” the federal government has a cheek to call Aboriginal communities dysfunctional.

Michael Anderson, spokesperson for the National Unity Aboriginal government, writes in a media release that whoever emerges as Prime Minister from Monday’s Labor caucus spill must talk with Aborigines about the British law that recognised Aboriginal sovereignty and dominion over Australia  separate from the colonial administration.

“The incidents that occurred during our 40th anniversary of the Aboriginal Tent Embassy [26 to 28 January in Canberra] certainly show how low and unethical Australian politicians can be to gain political ‘brownie points’ by exploiting this emotionally charged gathering, where grassroots Aboriginal people had gone to speak of their continuing grievances and were seeking to locate solutions that could be put to the colonising government,” Anderson, the last survivor of the four founders of the Embassy, writes.

“The Federal government has a cheek to call Aboriginal communities dysfunctional. I think it time they apologise for these denigrating inferences, given the absolute dysfunction of the Labor party as shown in recent times. Even more disappointing is the fact that they try to tell Aboriginal people and the rest of the world that he democratic way is the only way.“The leadership battles, personal abuses, exposure of Cabinet secrets, muck-raking and intrusion into family and personal lives as is popularly used in the United States and New South Wales in respect to the personal moralities of politicians, while searching for pure white puritan politician, is a process that is undiplomatic and unbecoming,” Anderson, leader of the Euahlayi nation says.

Anderson, sent for diplomatic training in the US State Department and at the United Nations by former Labor Prime Minister, Gough Whitlam, writes: “It is interesting that Mr Kevin Rudd has seen an opportunity to highlight the Gillard government’s inadequacy to deal with Aboriginal issues and to exercise a diplomatic process to deal with that situation that arose which led to PM Gillard’s entrapment in the Lobby Restaurant and then her inability to extract herself in a diplomatic and dignified way, losing her blue suede shoe in the process. .... Clearly diplomacy is one of her weak points.”

There is far more to this country than exploiting mineral and petroleum wealth, Anderson, a trained lawyer writes, adding: “If any political party is worried about the environment then they need to re-evaluate the massive resource boom, because the methane from the open cut coal mining far exceeds that of cattle, sheep, camels and kangaroos. Another environmental threat that is not discussed is the fine dust clouds floating across this continent and impacting on the respiratory systems of the constituency Australia wide.”

Contact: Michael Anderson, 02 68296355 landline, 04272 92 492 mobile, 02 68296375 fax, ngurampaa@bigpond.com.au, ghillar29@gmail.co

 

 Anderson’s statement in full:

 

 The Federal government has a cheek to call Aboriginal communities dysfunctional. I think it time they apologise for these denigrating inferences, given the absolute dysfunction of the Labor party as shown in recent times. Even more disappointing is the fact that they try to tell Aboriginal people and the rest of the world that he democratic way is the only way. The leadership battles, personal abuses, exposure of Cabinet secrets, muck-raking and intrusion into family and personal lives as is popularly used in the United States and New South Wales in respect to the personal moralities of politicians, while searching for pure white puritan politician, is a process that is undiplomatic and unbecoming.

The incidents that occurred during our 40th anniversary of the Aboriginal Tent Embassy [26 to 28 January in Canberra] certainly show how low and unethical Australian politicians can be to gain political ‘brownie points’ by exploiting this emotionally charged gathering, where grassroots Aboriginal people had gone to speak of their continuing grievances and were seeking to locate solutions that could be put to the colonising government.

It is interesting that Mr Kevin Rudd has seen an opportunity to highlight the Gillard government’s inadequacy to deal with Aboriginal issues and to exercise a diplomatic process to deal with that situation that arose which led to PM Gillard’s entrapment in the Lobby Restaurant and then her inability to extract herself in a diplomatic and dignified way, losing her blue suede shoe in the process.

Had Julia Gillard had any experience in diplomacy she could have prevented the unsightly images of herself being dragged out by security. Clearly diplomacy is one of her weak points.

‘The Aboriginal problem’ will never go away we see political leadership in this country representing the non-Aboriginal community, show true diplomatic and political leadership without internal dysfunction. The government continues to push ‘governance training down our people’s throats in our communities, but it seems to me this is a course they should undertake for the benefit of Australia as a whole.

The governments that followed Whitlam and Fraser have been politically retroactive, focusing too much on being seen to be ‘nice and pure’ in the eyes of the international community, thereby paying too little regard to the job at hand with the internal problems of their nation. If they can put away their international ambition to have a seat on the UN Security Council, they may be able to win support from their Australian constituency, focusing more attention on the socio-economic needs of Australians. There is far more to this country than exploiting mineral and petroleum wealth.

If any political party is worried about the environment then they need to re-evaluate the massive resource boom, because the methane from the open cut coal mining far exceeds that of cattle, sheep, camels and kangaroos. Another environmental threat that is not discussed is the fine dust clouds floating across this continent and impacting on the respiratory systems of the constituency Australia wide.

The emerging Aboriginal National Unity Government is prepared to talk to functional governments and or oppositions who have an open mind and a political will capable of dealing with the real issues of Aboriginal people and not continuing the ‘band aid’ solutions that have cost plenty in the previous decades yet still fail to hit the mark.

Whoever wins the Labor leadership spill, we call upon the next Prime Minister to meet with us to talk about the British law that recognised Aboriginal sovereignty and dominion over our land separate from the colonial administration. It is time the federal government realised that under English law the parliaments and legal system that they created comes from their colonial head of power, Britain, and the whole parliamentary system has been set up for their purposes, whilst at the same time Britain brought into law the separate political and legal status of Aboriginal people in an 1875 law in an unequivocal and unambiguous way, that Britain did not claim sovereignty over Aboriginal people, their leaders and chiefs, nor did they claim sovereignty and dominion over our places. It is time now that we commence formal discussions in this regard, but the government knows full well that they cannot do this without a truly representative Aboriginal government or they are required by domestic and international law to speak with every different linguistic Aboriginal nation within Australia, because one nation cannot speak for another nation. This is Aboriginal Law/Lore.

Previous releases by Anderson here and here.

Contact: Michael Anderson, 02 68296355 landline, 04272 92 492 mobile, 02 68296375 fax, ngurampaa@bigpond.com.au, ghillar29@gmail.com

Comments

"Michael Anderson, spokesperson for the National Unity Aboriginal government," who elected this government and what is its constitution? Is it democratically elected? Who by? Who voted? What is meant by aboriginal sovereignty? Isn't this a call for a two nation state like with Israel and Palestine?

I think the National Unity Government has no basis in fact, or any legitimacy whatsoever, and the call for sovereignty is dangerous and divisive.

If you are not an Aborigine, you are not qualified/entitled to comment and are just another whitefella who "knows what's best" for Aboriginal people. They have their own ways of doing things which are not for you to judge.

The country couldn't be more divided than it is between Aborigines and the other people in this country.

I guess if we can't get answers to my questions then no one will know the truth, whitefella or blackfella.

Ask Michael, his contact details are under the report.

In fact by saying whitefellas have no place in this discussion you are proving my contention that you are advocating a two state solution to the issue of indigenous Australia.

On a broader point, in one sense I am backward related by blood to indigenous Australia, both of my children and my grandchild are indigenous, although I myself am not.

I know that my daughter has not been contacted to participate in any process of election for any indigenous body, so I ask again, who voted, who was invited to ask, how is the body constituted, and how does it claim any legitimacy amongst aboriginal Australia?

If you are incapable of responding intelligibly to these questions one must surmise that you do not represent greater Australia, black OR white.

And the truth is that I ought not to have to put forward my credentials to speak on indigenous affairs. If this isnt meant for white people why broadcast it on this platform at all?

In fact it is racist to discriminate on the basis of skin colour.

I think you may be wrong in saying that. Whether or not you are Aboriginal, you are not right in saying that there is no place for comment on the way Aboriginal people do things. For a start, not all are the same,think the same nor do the same. They are diverse in their views about what is best for Aboriginal people. Thankfully, because it is diversity that allows survival of living beings. Second, there is so much dysfunction now that there is no way all Aboriginal people are able to think clearly about how things can be done. Just being Aboriginal does not give people protection from comment or fair criticism, so don't waste your time thinking that will ever be a right. There are Aboriginal ways that are fair game for criticisism. And, in making those statements, I do not imply any kind of righteousness or superiority of non Aboriginals, simply stating my opinion.

Well No-well ? me thinks you have not read the real history of this land you call Australia.?
Matters not who your children are but what does matter is that those who are still being targeted today, who themselves and their kin never rescinded their sovereignty over their lands, exact justice from those who have bullied them.

Yes , evan those of their own colour or race as you say.
You don't seem to have experienced this ? why ? I have and I am a white man with no aboriginal kin ties !

Your misuse of the term racist is amusing , go and read the dictionary meaning.

If after the formation of the "constitution", Aboriginals had been given the same rights as others, do you think there would be only a handful in parliament ? a Federal Capitol or even the States ? I think not, nor do I think they would be delegated to just another minority in a sea of immigrants, nor thrown into prisons or beaten to death for voicing their opinions etc etc etc

you cannot just brush these issues under your carpet and hope they will go away, they won't , be a part of the solution not the problem.

Permanent status politically is a necessity with authority across the land , would be a start but certainly not an end.