Australia: Look different and risk being assaulted

By Ghali Hassan

01 April, 2010

The ongoing, racially-motivated attacks on international students and people from non-Anglo-Saxon backgrounds, and concerted efforts by the Australian Government and the media to downplay racism, prove that Australians are unable and unwilling to live as a civilised society without racism. In white Anglo-Saxon Australia, it remains as deeply-entrenched as ever.

On February 6, 2010, at an international students' safety forum organised by the Victorian Immigrant and Refugee Women's Coalition in Melbourne, the Victoria Police Chief Commissioner Mr Simon Overland said: ”Don't display your iPods, don't display your valuable watch, and don’t display your valuable jewellery. Try to look as poor as you can or risk being assaulted.” (The Age, February 7, 2010). Mr Overland was referring to a spate of racially-motivated attacks against Indians in Melbourne. In reality, Mr Overland was saying: ‘If you look different (i.e., not white Anglo-Saxon), you risk being assaulted and it is your fault.’ Mr Overland was denying the existence of deeply-entrenched racism in Australia and blaming the victims of racially-motivated crimes.

The Australian government and media are refusing to acknowledge racially-motivated violence and continue to play down its horrendous effects on people from non-Anglo-Saxon backgrounds. The Government is concerned that racially-motivated violence on international students will damage Australia’s manufactured image and undermine Australia’s multimillion-dollar “education industry”, which is destroying Australia’s education system (For more, see my: “Australia’s Predatory Education”).

To be clear about Australia’s chronic racism, Indian students are not the only victims of racially-motivated violence in Australia. Violence against Indian students is reflected in racially-motivated crimes against anyone who looks different, whether Indigenous Australians, Muslim Australians, or people from ethnic minorities, including refugees. However, the majority of racially-motivated crimes are covered-up and excluded because they are considered politically unpalatable. Racially-motivated crimes against Indian students took centre stage, because of wide coverage by the vocal Indian media and the Indian community in Australia.

The primary victims of racially-motivated violence and discrimination in Australia are Australians of non-English speaking backgrounds, Muslims Australians, Indigenous Australians and refugees, including Africans.

On September 26, 2007, Liep Gony, a 19-year old Sudanese-Australian was murdered in Melbourne in an unprovoked and cowardly attack by two white Australians who were motivated by hatred of “blacks”. Kevin Andrews, the bigoted former Immigration minister in the Howard’s government, linked the murder of a young man who spent half of his life in Australia, to lack of “integration” on the part of the Sudanese refugees in Australia who continue to suffer discrimination.

In February 2010, an Australian student from non-English speaking background at a regional university in Southern Queensland was seriously assaulted by a white Anglo-Australian landlord. After the police arrived on the scene, the police immediately took sides to protect the white landlord. The student was removed from the property which he was renting and made homeless by the police despite the fact that the landlord was holding the student’s bond and rent money. The student was taken to the hospital and spent the night there. The landlord remains free and continues his illegal business preying on unprotected people.

When the student called the Residential Tenancy Authority, he was informed that the police acted unlawfully and that he should insist on laying charges against the landlord and demand compensation for damage. “Queensland is like the rest of Australia, extremely racist and extremely violent state”, wrote the student in an email. There is no doubt, if the crime had been committed by a non-Anglo Australian, the offender would have been arrested and charged.

The perception that the police were doing everything they could to stop assaults on non-Anglo-Saxon Australians and foreign students doesn’t stand up to scrutiny. Police inaction and Policing are part of the problem of racism in Australia.

On February 14, 2007, Ahmed Dini, an 18-year old youth of Somali origin was assaulted by a police officer at Flemington police station in Melbourne. The assault was so violent, the young man required dental surgery. Recently, an out-of-court settlement awarded the Somali man more than $70,000 in compensation for his ordeal. In another civil case, eight police officers based at Moonee Ponds police station are facing assault and false imprisonment charges after it was alleged that a 19-year-old African youth was assaulted by police and lost part of his sight in one eye. (The Age, March 17, 2010).

A new report by the Springvale Monash Legal Service (SMLS) revealed that police in Melbourne were assaulting and racially abusing young Africans, particularly [1]. Although the report covered only three regions in Melbourne (Braybrook, Flemington and Greater Dandenong), it is a good representative sample of Australia as a whole. In addition, the Australian Broadcasting Corp (ABC) revealed recently that a large number of Victoria Police, including senior officers, are involved in serious racial discrimination after a racist email was circulated state widely on the police email system. While not all police are racist and there are many honest and professional police, the vast majority of police in Australia are white Anglo-Saxon and like the rest of Anglo-Saxon Australia, racism is deeply entrenched in the police force.

A study by the Institute for Community, Ethnicity and Policy Alternatives (ICEPA) of Victoria University in Melbourne found that; “More than half (57%) of international students (not just Indian students) surveyed said they found Australia less safe than they have expected.” A majority (more than three-quarters) of international students reported “threats to their safety”, ranging from verbal abuse to violence that they believed was motivated by “a racial, religious or cultural element”, and even felt that “police at time displayed ethnic and racial bias” towards them, according to the ICEPA study.

Despite the disproportionately low rate of “ethnic” crimes, police across Australia are known to target certain groups. Australians from non-Anglo-Saxon background were more than three times likely to experience discrimination in policing than those white Australians born in Australia.

According to data gathered by the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission – a government funded department – Indigenous Australians are 15 times more likely to be imprisoned and 26 times more likely to be held in police custody than Anglo-Saxon Australians. Indigenous children are 18.6 times more likely to be held in detention.

In Western Australia – the nation’s redneck state – the rate is 32.4 times higher than for Indigenous children. In Queensland – the nation’s most corrupt state – more than half (55.7%) of young Australians in detention were Indigenous. In 2007, 432 of Australia's 742 juvenile prisoners were Indigenous.

Twenty years after the Royal Commission in Aboriginal Death in Custody, Indigenous Australians continue disproportionately to risk arrest, detention, assault and death in custody. In Queensland alone, there have been four deaths in custody in just over a month this year, one on February 20 and three in March 2010.

Discrimination against Muslims Australians (1.8 of Australia’s population) is on the rise. Muslim women have been an obvious target of racially-motivated attacks by racist Anglo Australians because their traditional dress makes them visible. On November 5, 2005, “[a Muslim woman] was punched, kicked, spat on and abused, told to ‘go home to her own country and left with an injury to her right eye’. Her sister, she said, had a knife thrust towards’ her face.” The family was picnicking at a Williamstown’s park near Melbourne. (The Age, November 13, 2005). ”I think families are staying home and avoiding going out, particularly women who wear the hijab, because we have seen that they are particularly targeted”, said Australian Arabic Council deputy chairman, Mr Taimor Hazou.

In February 2009, a Muslim student at the University of Western Sydney – the cesspool of Australian universities – was racially abused and assaulted by one of the University’s unskilled general staff. Despite overwhelming evidence of racially-motivated attack and the fact that the staff has admitted using racist language and violence, the University concocted and used baseless allegations to justify the student’s exclusion from the University just a few months before he was scheduled to complete his graduate study. The student was accused of calling another staff a “racist”, a form of bullying employed by Anglo-Australians not only to intimidate their victims of racism, but also to legitimise and normalise racism. While the student was denied the right to view the “evidence” against him, the accused staff continues to enjoy the University’s protection and support. Anglo Australians do not like to be called racist, but they love to preach “tolerance” with bigotry. When the student made a complaint to the NSW Ombudsman against the unfair and racist conduct of the University, the Ombudsman declined to investigate the case, because it would be against the Ombudsman’s role to act in public interest. The case highlights a policy that forms part of Australia’s systemic racism in higher education and employment.

For a decade, John Howard’s right-wing Liberal (Party) government reinvented and nurtured widespread racism and bigotry against Muslims. The September 11 events in America – which had nothing to do with Muslim nations – were a convenient tool used by the Howard’s government to enact anti-Muslim repressive and draconian “Anti-Terrorism” laws.

The current right-wing Labor Government of Prime Minister Kevin Rudd has adopted the same laws and discriminatory policy of its predecessor. On February 23, 2010, the Rudd Government unveiled its “Counter-Terrorism White Paper”, specifically targeted Muslims in Australia and people from a list of Muslim nations. Mr Rudd alleges that Australia is “under permanent terror threat” and “faces an increased terrorist threat from people born or raised in Australia”. Mr Rudd also announced tougher visa checks of people from ten nations. The Rudd government is refusing to name these nations, and no one knows if Israel, the world’s leading terrorist sate, is on the list.

To date, not a single Australian has been killed by “terrorists” in Australia. It is the Australian army that is participating (as a mercenary force to enforce U.S.-Zionist ideology) in the slaughter of innocent Muslims in Afghanistan and Iraq. In poor Afghanistan, the massacres of school children and women have become a daily ritual. In Iraq, an estimated 1.5 million innocent Iraqis (mostly women and children) have been slaughtered since 2003 – the third phase of a long holocaust that began in 1991 – in one of the most premeditated mass murders of civilians in modern history with the full support of the Australian government. Furthermore, during the Israeli attacks on the population of Gaza (under Israeli military siege since 2006) in December 2008-January 2009, when more than 1,420 defenceless Palestinians (mostly women and children) were massacred in cold blood, Australia was one of a handful of Western governments that supported Israel’s terror and war crimes, and continues to do so unconditionally.

Australia’s “Anti-Terrorism” laws are aimed at manipulating the public, fomenting fear and stoking up resentment against Muslims. Indeed, Muslim men in Australia were rounded-up, imprisoned, put on show trials and convicted of “terrorism”. Recently, some Muslim men were found guilty on preposterous charges – with no victims and no known targets. The aim is to intimidate and bully the entire Muslims community, and to send a message that Muslims are dangerous and that Muslim Australians do “not belong” to this country.

To make the situation worse for Muslims, the Australian media – a collection of anti-Muslim Zionist and proto-fascist outlets competing with each other to promote Israel-U.S. ideology – play an important role in the construction of racialised communities as “ethnic” and in inciting hatred and promoting Islamophobia among Anglo-Saxon Australians. Muslim Australians are demonised and presented as a ‘threat to the Australian values’. Adolf Hitler and his Nazi propagandists would have been pleased to have such racist propaganda organs on their side, inflaming xenophobia and promoting fascist ideology.

On the surface, Australia is a friendly and “multicultural” (best defined as anti-cultural) country until you scratch the surface. Most, if not all, Anglo-Saxon Australians see themselves as being uniquely pure and superior to all ‘other’ people by virtue of their Anglo-Saxon origin. It is a very backward thinking. Racially-motivated violence and discrimination formed the foundation of Anglo-Australia and were forged into the Australian national character, and remain so today alive and thriving throughout Australian culture.

Australia’s manufactured image of a “fair-go for all” is an illusion designed to project Australia as an equal society and cover-up deeply-entrenched racism. Just take a look at who is doing what. Privileged employments are reserved for the white Anglo-Saxon majority, with few places for those exotic faces that are chosen to tick the so-called “equal opportunity” box. White Anglo-Saxon middle-class and rich males “shape legislation, administration and judicial texts in their own image and to their own advantage”, wrote Margaret Thornton, a legal scholar and professor of law at the Australian National University (ANU). One of the many places to watch white Anglo-Saxon Australians indulging in keeping their privilege and defending their white ideology is the exclusively white clubs of the Australian federal and state parliaments, they are white only territories.

A survey on racial and ethnic discrimination in Australia by the Research School of Economics at the Australian National University released in June 2009 found clear evidence of racism in employment. The study revealed that Australians with “foreign” sounding names had greater difficulty of finding employment than those Australians with Anglo-Saxon names. According to the study, people with a Middle Eastern background (i.e., Muslims) had to send 127 per cent more applications for a waiter’s position than their Anglo-Saxon contenders [2]. As a result, unemployment among Australians from non-Anglo-Saxon background is significantly high. As a nation, Australia has no ‘Bill of Rights’, but it has ‘anti-discrimination’ legislation to legitimise racial discrimination.

A civilised Australia rests on the pillars of non-discriminatory equality and justice for all of its citizens, regardless of skin colour, race, religion, wealth and political affiliation. The best solution is for Australia to adopt non-discriminatory policies and makes people’s safety and wellbeing its top priority.

Ghali Hassan is an independent writer living in Australia.

[1] Smith B. & Reside, S. (2010, March). ‘Boys, You Wanna Give Me Some Action?’ Intervention into Policing of Racialised Communities in Melbourne. Melbourne: Legal Services Board of Victoria. (PDF).

[2] Booth, A., Leigh, A., & Varganova, E. (2009, June). Does Racial and Ethnic Discrimination Vary Across Minority Groups? Evidence from a Field Experiment, (Working paper). Canberra: Australian National University, Research School of Economics. (PDF).

Comment by Ray Jackson, president indigenous social justice association:

despite all the mouthings of terrorist doom and gloom of both howard and krudd and their acolytes, ghali is correct when he says that there has never been an attack on australian soil. there has been allegations of alleged possible maybe attacks made by asio and the afp but they have never convinced me of that happening.

whilst we're on the topic of terrorist attacks, the only one that was trumpeted by howard as an attack on australians was the bali bombing of that nightclub. just after that occurred a prominent journalist stated that the attack was not aimed at the australian tourists per se but at the american troops on r&r who frequented the nightclub as a matter of course. the aussie tourists were very much a bonus target, the real target was the americans.

for unknown reasons the americans were pulled out prior to the event leaving the tourists to take the brunt of the bomb and the explosion. this action by the american forces raises at least two questions.

the first is whether or not the americans received information that a terrorist threat could be imminent, hence the withdrawal of their troops, and the second question is if such information was received, was that information passed on to the australian authorities of the time which in fact raises a third question of how that information was dealt with, if received.

both the governments of america and australia were dead keen to get australia more involved in the war on terror which leads to the ramification of the answers to the above questions becoming of great importance and relevance.

the statement was obliterated and the journalist never raised it again. the information in the statement was sourced to an american intelligence officer. just a thought.

since the prime ministership of malcolm fraser, who welcomed the vietnamese boat people and the concept of a real multicultural australia, our fair-go concept and our duty of care to asylum seekers has diminished greatly. hawke,keating and howard seemed to be in contest as to who could be the most racist whilst also becoming the most jingoistic. the leadership that fraser had shown so easily was mutated by his predecessors until most thinking australians were shamed by their collective actions.

as a youth i lived with my grandmother at woolloomooloo and in the late 40's and early 50's i saw the entry of the italians and greeks as refugees of the war. i still remember the arrival of a migrant ship at the woolloomooloo wharf and the excited faces leaning over the ship's rail. some of those present on the wharf smiled at them but the language used was not welcoming but the refugees smiled and waved back anyway, not understanding what was being directed at them. we have always had racists in australia and the so-called 'ten pound poms' also got their share of it.

but we needed these people to do the heavy and dirty work that australians wouldn't do, like the snowy scheme.

the point is that governments showed strong leadership in bringing and accepting these migrants/boat people to australia. it was only when the politicians in power decided that we were to become 'fortress white australia' that the covert racism that we lived with everyday became very overt. and the leaders opted for a racist australia whilst mouthing meaningless inanities about 'we are the land of the fair-go' (we are not and still have a long way to go to reaching that goal) and that other useless platitude of 'the australian way'. (it still means nothing).

we must know unequivocally that as we sow so shall we reap. if we are to continue to follow our racist leaders in all walks of life then we must accept that this country is still under the thrall of the howard and hanson evils.

i for one will not and cannot accept that they speak for me. they most decidedly do not.



Discrimination is not only black and white , but also social standing in society , people in a feign country feels this more , more so is your skin stands out , than attitude is dictated by environmental living conditions , where there is no law people make their own laws with limited resources and experience , and often limited broader knowledge , made worse by gossip of hear say , from a one sided angel, usually of their own country , politically motivated and manipulated .
Than a fear of insecurity, after all there are more coulerd people than whites in the world,
Apartheid is still rampant , this is a shame, as personally I love to see a little colour in mixed races hence as a white face I never looked at a European lady , but cultural inadvertence is a serious problem to overcome , the white man has contributed to such ignorance , and exploited that with self gain, this now comes to a end . My experience with Immigration in Australia acting in the interests of oversees visa applicants educated me this personally , people from Asia are pree judged not so much by race but economic standing , one immigration officer actually stated even if I was right , that there immigration department had no reason to deny my friend entry ,did I realise how many applications they are receiving , So I requested my money back , he said NO! As it was a application fee without guarantee of suchsece , So the conclusion is he obtained a application fee without genuine intend , in our country this is froughtulandly obtained ,
Well that seems now to be understood as a bad mistake, the Australian government as a whole conspiracy have used other departments sins, and I am not even a Muslim or have a brown skin .
So now they have taught me, its all about monopoly, this is an international culture. That will never be stamped out based on a drug called money.
However: you have travel rights, this now can be aunty monopolized by the same you pay a visa for services render without p

Young Australian:
Hi Mr Ghali Hassan,
I want to correct a different article that you wrote- 'Islamiphobia' because there is actually a law against racism in the Northern Territory as well as the two other states that you mentioned. Actually, in my high school there were a number of girls who wore Muslim clothing to school and were fine with that. When my friend suddenly started wearing the clothes because of something to do with age, her religion and personal choice, people did ask her a lot of questions for a start. But, it was only out of curiosity. Satisfied that it was actually her personal choice and that she was happy with it, a lot of people said that she is very cool and it was so brave and mature of her to make such a big life decision at such a young age!

Joan M Tasmania:
I agree with most of what you say - though you sound pretty vitriolic yourself. I doubt if westerners would be granted much freedom to dress and worship differently if they migrated to non-western countries. This is what humanity is like - very territorial, basically aggressive, only superficially civilised. That's why the main business of advanced nations is warmaking.
main business of the US is war-making n business of advanced nations - Sadly, we ha 10 years of Howard and his kowtowing to the US, Israel, Nato.



yeah, well... its just morons following the governments lead, but it happens in most countries. we aint special.

No, other way round: governments taking the lead from morons.

If there weren't this ingrained xenophobia in the general Australian psyche, governments couldn't perpetrate their horrific race crimes, e.g. on Aboriginal compatriots and refugees.

They're doing it for the morons to harvest their votes.

Anonymous we can be special and change.
We can accept that we are all one and live in peace.
I live in hope.

Kevin Rudd - - is a right winger? 0_0

for shame.

“Adolf Hitler and his Nazi propagandists would have been pleased to have such racist propaganda organs on their side, inflaming xenophobia and promoting fascist ideology.”

I totally concur with what Ghali Hassan writes about Australian racism.

But his reference to Nazi propaganda is too weak.

The Nazis monopolised all the means of communication - printing, broadcasting, staging or filming only Nazi material, effectively flooding Germany with their propaganda.

Journalists who crossed the propaganda ministry were routinely imprisoned or shot as traitors. Other punishments ranged from banning of presentation and publishing of works to deportation.

All media - literature, music, newspapers, radio, theatre and other public events - were censored. Attempts were also made to censor private communications, such as mail and even private conversation, with mixed results.

Joseph Goebbels' "Ministry of Public Enlightenment and Propaganda" acted as a central control-point for all media, issuing orders on what stories could be run or had to be suppressed.

Due to the opinion-changing power Goebbels perceived movies to have, anyone involved in the film industry - from directors to the lowliest assistants - had to sign an oath of loyalty to the Nazi Party. Goebbels himself maintained some personal control over every single film made in Nazi-controlled Europe.

The press and the cinema had to show pictures glorifying the Nazi movements. The ministry worked to build up the popularity of the Führer.

The aim of censorship was simple: to reinforce Nazi power and to suppress opposing viewpoints and information. Hitler outlined his theory of propaganda and censorship in his book “Mein Kampf”: "The chief function of propaganda is to convince the masses, whose slowness of understanding needs to be given time so they may absorb information; and only constant repetition will finally succeed in imprinting an idea on their mind."

Media control was part of the process of “Gleichschaltung”, meaning "coordination", "making the same", "bringing into line" or "forcible-coordination", by which the Nazi regime successively established a system of totalitarian control over the individual and tight coordination over all aspects of society and commerce.

For some of the many tactics used to deal with newspapers, media and other propaganda see

See also on how Goebbels and the regime used media to their advantage.

Now, why do I keep thinking about the Murdoch empire of television outlets, radio stations, film studios, newspapers (from mighty titles like The Times of London and The Wall Street Journal to my local give-away), magazines, book publishing.....have I forgotten anything?......across many countries?

The man who after a one-hour private meeting at his News Corporation Building in New York and dining with him magnanimously pontificated on 21 April 2007 that he was "sure" Krudd would make a good prime minister (

Some of the incidents you use to support the existence of racism in Australian society aren't exclusively racial issues. If an "Anglo-Saxon" Australia is assaulted, robbed, raped, murdered etc. by a member of another race it does not automatically mean that this is a motivation for the crime to have occurred. I think you should realise that the most important part of independent media is objectivity.

I feel dumber for having read this trash.