NSW Ombudsman confirms maladministration at Canterbury City Council

The investigation by the NSW Ombudsman into the Conduct of Canterbury City Council has concluded and the findings in the Final report state Canterbury City Council FAILED.

Errs, contradictions, improper conduct, etc... at the senior management level and helm of Canterbury City Council.

Notice of the investigation was previously released at Sydney IndyMedia and although the headlines to it and the related issues appear in search engines - the careless, incompetent actions and inactions of the Council over the last near 7 years and earlier have been lost/destroyed.

The Mallone family are not surprised by the findings or recommendations by the Ombudsman. They have been telling the Council over and over again that the issues raised in 2003, 2005, 2007, 2008 and 2009 were handled with complete negligence by Council.

The General Manager Mr Jim Montague and Mayor Robert Furolo had refused to respond appropriately; to address the issues; or investigate the issues over the years. Their view was and remains, the cliff resides on private property therefore the unacceptable risk to people and property was not the responsibility of the Council in anyway. It was an amazing stance they took and that they continue to take knowing full well that Council actions and inactions created the instability in the first place.

When Council stormwater is collected, directed and simply dumped into private properties at the top of a cliff for some thiry or more years, how can this Council simply say the land owner is responsible?

When Council refuses landowners permission to remove damaging trees from the cliff over and over again, and post a geotechnical engineers report being provided to the Council, then again, how can this Council simply say the land owner is responsible?

When Council refuses to provide or address whether major works at the cliff top had Council approval, and it describes these major works as simply minor works and states to the Ombudsman that the works were certified in 2002, yet the Ombudsman finds no evidence of these works being minor nor certified and therefore there was no thorough assessment on the impact of these works to neighbouring cliff property owners land, then how can this Council simply say the land owner is responsible?

The NSW Ombudsman describes the many Council "failures" as "unreasonable conduct". The public would describe the many Council failures as incompetent, negligent and dishonest actions and inactions that occurred knowing full well that an innocent elderly woman was being held responsible and had been threatened with legal action.

These issues were serious safety issues that placed people at an unacceptable risk of injury and death. Geotechnical engineers clearly advised the risk of injury/death was unacceptable in 2003 (200 times above the acceptable standards), yet Council simply sent the problem back to Mrs Mallone's neighbours stating the land owner is responsible. Again, yes land owners are responsible to maintain their property but when Council actions and inactions are the direct result for a collapsing cliff then ultimately, Council was required to do more than pass the buck back to innocent land owners who were prevented from maintaining their land by Council.

Incredibly it wasn't until two full years later when Mrs Mallone (a 6% land owner of cliff) was informed of this 2003 geotechnical report and its recommendations that included, calling on Council involvement!

This Council negligence and refusal to get involved reoccured in 2005 & 2006 and then caused Mrs Mallone to be dragged into the Supreme Courts by her neighbours. For the next three years Council denied it's actions/inactions were negligent, nor the cause for her massive legal debt, now reaching near $250,000. They claimed over and over again the Council investigated the matter, yet the Ombudsman states it found no evidence of any investigations occurring.

Incredibly the General Manager was honored with a Public Service Medal in 2006.

Near five years of hell for an 82 year old woman left with a legal defence bill of near $250,000 and the NSW Ombudsman now confirms it found no evidence of any Council investigation occurring that Council claimed on at least three occasions, had occurred.

The Canterhury City Council Mayor and General Manager simply couldn't be bothered to investigate the complaints or issues raised, allowing the situation to simply worsen.

The first of 18 recommendations is that Canterbury City Council issue an apology to the Mallone family.

A safe Labor seat disgrace where this Council including its Councillors and MP's should hang their heads in shame for not only refusing to act but for refusing to apologise to the numerous innocent people that have had their lives destroyed by their failure to perform their duties.

When this is the conduct of a Council when people's lives were at risk then what conduct is occurring in this Council over the less important issues that Council handles?

The Council and the people: http://www.canterbury.nsw.gov.au
The photos and comments: http://picasaweb.google.com.au/supportmallone

Do you believe an apology is all Mrs Mallone is due?

Geography: 

Comments

Sue,

Mrs Mallone is 83 years old is about to commence that process. She has a near $300,000 debt solely because of the actions and inactions of this incompetent and dishnoest Council, she is on the Australian pension and receives a small overseas pension. She requires assistance and the support of the public and media to get through this.

She has offered to settle this out of court (see http://bit.ly/Offer2Council) but this Council will attempt anything to avoid admitting it's negligence (negligence with intent) and they have refused her offer to settle this via mediation (see their response here http://bit.ly/CouncilMedResp).

Their limitation period, issue estoppel and anshunn principle is garbage and does not apply here. As for advising their insurer - one questions why the Councic insurance company who in turn will raise insurance premiums (paid by the ratepayers) must pay for the negligence and inept leadership of Canterbury City Council including its Councillors.

The General Manager Jim Montague, Mayor Robert Furolo and it's Councillors (especially the three East Ward Councillors) who sat their refusing to perform their duties should be the people that answer to their failures not the ratepayers and not an insurance company.

And let's not forget the number of NSW Premier and Ministers of Local Govt that are as inept as the General Manager of Canterbury CIty Council who over and over again stated that he had investigated the failures of his Council when he simply couldn't be bothered and did NOTHING other LIE. LIES the office of the NSW Ombudsman did not address in the NSW Ombudsman report.

NSW Ombudsman report slamming Manly Council can be read or downloaded from:

http://specials-cumberland.whereilive.com.au/media/ombudsmans-report.pdf

NSW Ombudsman report slamming Canterbury Council can be read or downloaded from:

http://bit.ly/cHxhdO

What a great example this man sets for the youth of today.

Further failures of Mayor/MP Robert Furolo can be read at:

Accidents always have a CAUSE Mr Furolo. And this statement is not dissimilar to the FAILURES of Canterbury City Council identified by the NSW Ombudsman recently that you refused to address and continue refusing to address. These failures also had a CAUSE.

That CAUSE Mr Furolo is you.

Socialist shakedown in lack lustre Labor
by Alex Mitchell (SMH)
October 31, 2010

Labor's primary vote has plunged to 23 per cent and it will get worse if MPs follow the example of Robert Furolo, the member for Lakemba and mayor of Canterbury. He took a friend's $400,000 Lamborghini for a midnight joyride and crashed. Sums up NSW Labor to perfection.

SMH http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/socialist-shakedown-in-lacklustre-labor-201010...

Looks like the incompetence, negligence and the garbage responses from those responsible never ends.

http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/canterbury-on-the-road-to-ruin/sto...

When will the Councillors of this Council concede they are failures?

When will the Member for Canterbury Linda Burney concede that she ignored her constituents?

When will the Minister of Local Government Barbara Perry concede that she should not have ignored the NSW Ombudsman investigation and report into the FAILURES and UNREASONABLE conduct of Canterbury Council?

Youtube video of some medium rainfall occurring on Nov 8 has now been loaded. http://bit.ly/PSVideo1

It had been raining for about 5 minutes when the video began recording.

Take note that the rocks, debris and other crap when we arrive at the bottom of the stairway and in the road gutter was dumped there during the rain that occurred on the evening of 4 Nov 2010. See the photos at http://bit.ly/ParrySteps5

Have a reading of the video commentary that explains it all.

Photos of the mess the following morning can be seen

at Picasa http://bit.ly/ParrySteps6

Get rid of these mongrels

http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/survivor-nsw-the-voter-tribe-has-s...

Our choice

Robert Furolo
Linda Burney
Barbara Perry
Paul Lynch

And the one that protexts them all. Kristina Keneally.

Show them what they deserve.

Supporters of Mrs Mallone are now twittering

www.twitter.com/supportmallone

Follow us in support of holding the people and authorities accountable for their actions and inactions that left this now 83 year old pensioner with a debt exceeding $250,000 but the causes to the cliff instability left completely unaddressed.

Solely unaddressed because the General Manager of Canterbury City Council will do anything to keep his dirty linen from being exposed.

How does the general manager Canterbury City Council Jim Montague state no stormwater drainage works are required on No 14 http://bit.ly/CCCDishonesty9 when these http://picasaweb.google.com/SupportMallone/CouncilApprovesAndCondonesIna... are the results of No 14 stormwater entering Mrs Mallone's property.

And how does this dishonest man he will only release the information if she accepts a confidentiality agreement http://bit.ly/CCC_Unreasonable.

What the hell is the Greens Councillor Linda Eisler doing? Who in the hell does she represent?

And how in the hell did this MAJOR works be allowed to occur on such a dominant landscape without any Development Application process occurring or just a bloody impact study done?