Alpine grazing action alert - Friends of the Earth

Cattle were removed from the Alpine National Park in 2005 by the government of Steve Bracks. This was an important step forward for good land management in our state. Since then, some of the long term damage caused by decades of grazing have started to heal. However, the Victorian Coalition announced in the build up to the November election that it would return cattle grazing to Victoria's alpine national parks as a tool to reduce fire risk.

Related: Alpine National Park... or cow paddock? | Victorian National Parks Association: opinion piece | Report: Science, credibility and alpine grazing | Cattle grazing in the Alps FAQ

It probably made sense to summer graze cows in the alps when the practise started. Given what we now know – of the ecological damage they cause – it made sense to remove them from the precious alpine areas.

Putting them back in – in the very headwaters of our most significant river systems in a time of climate change would mean turning our backs on common sense land management. Grazing greatly damages the alpine systems including the peat beds that release high quality water into our river systems across the north east of the state.

Research on alpine grazing has consistently shown that the pro grazing mantra 'grazing reduces blazing' simply isn't true.

The Victorian National Parks Association has substantial information on the question of grazing and fires which is available here:

http://vnpa.org.au/page/nature-conservation/parks-protection/alpine-catt...

We need to send a strong message to the new government that the majority of Victorians do not support the re-introduction of grazing into the Alps and other protected areas like the Barmah forest.

TAKE ACTION

Please write to the premier and environment minister, explaining that you are opposed to the reintroduction of cattle grazing into Victoria's alpine environment.

You could mention that the grazing of cattle in a national park is inconsistent with conservation management, which is the main purpose of national parks protection. It will not help reduce fire risk. Our alps are at great risk from climate change and do not need that degradation that will come with grazing.

Simply send a brief email outlining your concerns, with your name and address to:

The Hon Ted Baillieu MP
Premier of Victoria
ted.baillieu@parliament.vic.gov.au

The Hon Ryan Smith MP
Minister for Environment and Climate Change
ryan.smith@parliament.vic.gov.au

It would be great if you could cc us a copy so we know how many letters have gone in: foe@foe.org.au

Geography: 

Comments

Given that Global Warming and Climate Change are being proven to be a farce and a giant Con Job, and that the emotive argument that cattle damage the landscape is also being disproved, why would anybody in their right mind protest?

If the Earth is flat, why don't you drop from underneath?

Cattle grazing to reduce fire risk is a furphy.

"There was no evidence that grazing has reduced shrub cover, and therefore potential fire risk, in open heathland. These findings have significant management implications for the Alpine National Park and are consistent with those from other regions in the Australian alps."

from Abstract - Long-Term Vegetation Change in Relation to Cattle Grazing in Sub-Alpine Grassland and Heathland on the Bogong High-Plains: an Analysis of Vegetation Records From 1945 to 1994 by CHA Wahren, WA Papst and RJ Williams , Australian Journal of Botany 42(6) 607 - 639, Full text doi:10.1071/BT9940607

If FOE actually go up to the high country and talk to the people there they would discover a few important facts.

1. The grazing in the Alpine areas has been going on for 150 years without any enviromental damage to speak of. I used to ride through the area regularly, the only impact the cattle had was to keep down the scrub which provides so much of the leaf litter for fires. You can now barely make it to the areas I once rode through due to masses of dead fuel on the ground.

2. There are 100,000 feral deer in the high country [as opposed to 1500 cattle on a strictly seasonal basis before the ban] . Deer like stripping the bark off trees much more than cattle do and kill off native trees much faster. Shooting these deer is considered poaching, something most residents of the area cheerfully ignore.

Maybe the FOE should move outside Zone 1 on the trainlines before pontificating on issues they don't understand.

Fire is natural and needed

Fire is a part of australia

If fire is the EXCUSE maybe this isnt the country for you

170 years ha ha ha, try 40,000

using and abusing isnt compatable with aus

A little education goes a long way?